Skip to the content
Compass
AboutWhat can I enter?Sign in

The guide

5

You don’t have to move

Routes that pay, teach or judge you from where you already are. Leaving is one answer. It is not the only one.

6 routes that judge the work, not the address it came from.

Showing: Every field

Every one of these is open to you this month, from where you already live.

Paid open-source programmes

Google Summer of Code, Outreachy and the LFX Mentorship pay students a stipend to spend a few months working on a real open-source project, mentored by the people who maintain it.

The catch

All three are competitive and none of them are quick: you write a project proposal weeks in advance, and the strongest applicants have already been contributing to that project before applying. Cycles run once a year, so missing the window costs you a year.

Your first move

Pick one project you already use and read its issue tracker for anything labelled good-first-issue. Fixing one small thing, publicly, is both the practice and the thing that makes a later proposal credible.
What it costs you in time
Realistically a term of consistent evenings before you are a credible applicant, then a full-time summer if you are accepted. The contribution habit is the slow part; the application itself is a few weeks of writing.
What you can show afterwards
A public commit history with your name on it, in a project strangers use. That's the strongest single artefact on this whole list. It is verifiable, permanent, and it shows how you work rather than claiming it.
Who it suits, and who it doesn’t
Suits you if you can work alone against a vague problem and ask good questions in public. Look elsewhere if you need someone to tell you what to do next. Mentors here guide, they don't supervise.
Add to my plan

Data-science competitions

Kaggle and Zindi run open machine-learning contests judged purely on a score against held-out data. Nobody sees your school, your country or your age, only the number. They're also the cheapest teacher available: Kaggle publishes free short courses, and every finished competition leaves behind the winners' own notebooks explaining exactly what they did and why, which is a level of access no textbook gives you.

The catch

The leaderboard is honest but brutal, and the top of it is professionals. Treat the first several attempts as learning rather than as a result you'll put on an application. The failure mode is the opposite of laziness: people spend months 'preparing' before entering, and preparation without a submission teaches almost nothing.

Your first move

Enter one beginner-tier competition and submit something bad on purpose, just to get through the whole loop once. The second submission is where learning starts. Then read the discussion thread and one public notebook from someone above you, and copy their approach deliberately. That isn't cheating, it is how the field teaches itself.
What it costs you in time
A weekend for your first honest attempt, then a few hours a week for as long as it stays interesting. There is no deadline pressure beyond the one you choose, which is why people drift away.
What you can show afterwards
A public profile with a ranking and, more usefully, the notebooks showing your reasoning. A modest placing you can explain beats a better one you can't.
Who it suits, and who it doesn’t
Suits you if you like being scored objectively and aren't discouraged by a leaderboard full of professionals. Look elsewhere if you need collaboration. This is mostly solitary work.
Add to my plan

Research and writing that publishes you

Journals for school-age researchers, essay competitions run by universities, and open science projects accept work from anywhere and judge the work itself.

The catch

A serious piece takes months and usually needs an adult who knows the field to read a draft, and a teacher is enough. Beware anything that charges a large fee to publish you; being printed isn't the same as being reviewed.

Your first move

Choose a question small enough to answer properly in ten pages, and find the person who will read your first draft before you write it.
What it costs you in time
Months, not weeks: a serious piece takes a term or two alongside school, and the reading comes before any of the writing shows.
What you can show afterwards
A finished, dated piece of work with your argument in it: published, entered somewhere, or simply readable. Length isn't the point; a tight ten pages that answers one question properly is the artefact.
Who it suits, and who it doesn’t
Suits you if you can hold one question for months and take criticism on a draft without defending it. Look elsewhere if you want quick feedback. This is the slowest route here.
Add to my plan

Free university courses

Harvard, MIT and Stanford put full courses online for nothing, and several issue a certificate at the end. They cost time and nothing else.

The catch

A certificate of completion is weak evidence on its own. Thousands of people have the same one, and an unfinished course is worth nothing at all. It counts when it is the visible foundation under something you then built or entered.

Your first move

Start one course that a thing you already want to do depends on, and finish it. One finished beats four abandoned.
What it costs you in time
Several hours a week for the length of the course, and the completion rate on open courses is famously low precisely because nothing external holds you to it. Treat the schedule as real or it won't happen.
What you can show afterwards
The certificate is weak evidence on its own. What counts is the thing you built afterwards that the course made possible. Finish the course, then immediately use it for something, and let that be the proof.
Who it suits, and who it doesn’t
Suits you if you need a structured foundation in a subject nobody near you teaches. Look elsewhere if you already have the foundation. Building something is worth more of your hours than another course.
Add to my plan

Remote work for foreign clients

Design, software and writing are bought remotely, which means the pay for a piece of work stops being set by the town you live in.

The catch

Getting the first client is the hard part and referrals dominate; payment, tax and contracts are your problem, and rates start low until you've something public to point at. This is a route for older students, not for a 14-year-old.

Your first move

Make the portfolio before the profile: three finished pieces someone can look at do more than any listing on a freelance site.
What it costs you in time
The portfolio comes first and takes months; the first client can take months more. After that it is real working hours, which is why this route suits older students rather than fourteen-year-olds.
What you can show afterwards
Paid work for someone who isn't related to you, and pieces you are allowed to show. The first paying client is the credential. Everything after it is easier.
Who it suits, and who it doesn’t
Suits you if you are self-directed about deadlines and comfortable asking to be paid. Look elsewhere if you are still at school with heavy exams ahead. The time cost is real and lands at the worst moment.
Add to my plan

Starting the thing that is missing locally

A club, a tutoring group, a local olympiad team, a small event. Admissions officers and employers read this as initiative, and nowhere in the world is it easier to be the founder of something than in a place that has none of it.

The catch

It only counts if it survives past the first month and someone other than you shows up. A club that exists on paper for an application is visible as exactly that.

Your first move

Find the teacher who will give you a room and an hour a week, and run the first session for whoever turns up, even if it is only two people.
What it costs you in time
A weekly commitment for at least a term, and it only counts once it has survived the first month when the novelty wears off and attendance dips.
What you can show afterwards
A thing that exists and outlasts you: members, sessions run, a result someone else can confirm. It's the most locally verifiable item on this list, and the hardest to fake.
Who it suits, and who it doesn’t
Suits you if you can keep going when only two people turn up, and want something on your record that is unmistakably yours. Look elsewhere if you want individual technical depth. This builds a different muscle.
Add to my plan

“But I don’t know how to do any of this yet”

Neither did anyone who does. The honest answer to “how did you learn this?” is almost always the same one: they entered something before they were ready, and looked up whatever they got stuck on. The entering is not the reward for learning. It is the method.

These platforms are built for exactly that. Kaggle publishes free courses and every finished competition leaves the winners’ own notebooks behind, explaining what they did. Open-source projects have their whole review history in public. Nobody is waiting for you to qualify first. You get in, you get stuck, you read, and that is the entire loop.

So the useful first move is never a course. It is a bad submission, a small pull request, a rough draft: something real and finished enough to get feedback on. The people whose profiles look intimidating got them by doing that repeatedly, not by preparing longer.

Leaving is one route. It is not the only one, and for plenty of students it is not the best one. A strong record built from where you are is what makes leaving possible later, if you still want to.

See what you can enter this yearThe catalog, filtered to your age and your fields.